Spatial Frames of Reference and Non Digital Way-finding: A Longitudinal Study of Cultural Persistence in Namibian and Inuit Communities

Main Article Content

Muhammad Ridwan
Belay Sitotaw Goshu

Abstract

This longitudinal study (2005–2025) examined cultural persistence in spatial frames of reference (FoRs) and non‑digital wayfinding among the ≠Akhoe Haiǁom of Namibia (n = 84) and Inuit of Igloolik, Nunavut (n = 72). Across three waves, absolute (geocentric) FoRs remained predominant in both communities, with no significant population‑level decline Haiǁom: 78 % to 74 %; Inuit: 72 % to 69 % (both p  > 0.05). However, significant generational differences emerged: younger participants (≤ 30 years) showed lower absolute FoR preference than older adults (≥ 50 years) in both groups (Haiǁom: 69 % vs. 82 %; Inuit: 62 % vs. 77 %; β = 0.42 and 0.39, respectively, p < 0.01). Importantly, the generational gap did not widen over time (no wave × cohort interaction). Self‑reported GPS use rose dramatically (Haiǁom: 4 % to 41 %; Inuit: 12 % to 67  %), yet increased GPS use was not associated with diminished wayfinding accuracy when controlling for age (β = 0.07, 95 % CI [–0.03, 0.17], p = 0.16). Qualitative data revealed that participants actively domesticated GPS as a supplemental tool, preserving geocentric strategies for primary orientation. These findings support a model of adaptive persistence, wherein core orienting schemas resist rapid transformation while peripheral strategies undergo selective innovation. We conclude that culturally embedded FoRs constitute a resilient cognitive resource, with implications for theories of cultural cognition, indigenous knowledge preservation, and the design of culturally responsive navigation technologies.

Article Details

How to Cite
Ridwan, M., & Belay Sitotaw Goshu. (2026). Spatial Frames of Reference and Non Digital Way-finding: A Longitudinal Study of Cultural Persistence in Namibian and Inuit Communities. Lakhomi Journal Scientific Journal of Culture, 7(2), 74-83. Retrieved from https://www.biarjournal.com/index.php/lakhomi/article/view/1516
Section
Articles

References

Aporta, C. (2003). Old routes, new trails: Contemporary Inuit travel and orienting in Igloolik, Nunavut (Publication No. 3152) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Alberta]. https://doi.org/10.7939/r3-hdx7-m806
Aporta, C., & Higgs, E. (2005). Satellite culture: Global Positioning Systems, Inuit wayfinding, and the need for a new account of technology. Current Anthropology, *46*(5), 729–753. https://doi.org/10.1086/432651
Golledge, R. G. (Ed.). (1999). Wayfinding behavior: Cognitive mapping and other spatial processes. Johns Hopkins University Press. https://doi.org/10.56021/9780801859879
Haun, D. B. M., Rapold, C. J., Call, J., Janzen, G., & Levinson, S. C. (2011). Cognitive cladistics and cultural override in Hominid spatial cognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, *108*(52), 20912–20917. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1114354108
Levinson, S. C. (2003). Space in language and cognition: Explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge University Press.
Majid, A., Bowerman, M., Kita, S., Haun, D. B. M., & Levinson, S. C. (2004). Can language restructure cognition? The case for space. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, *8*(3), 108–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.01.003
Mingon, M., Gillett, A. J., & Sutton, J. (2026). Being where? Putting memory, technology, and wayfinding together again. Review of Philosophy and Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-026-00816-0
Sinha, C., & Jensen de López, K. (2000). Language, culture and the embodiment of spatial cognition. Cognitive Linguistics, *11*(1–2), 17–42. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2001.007
United Nations. (2007). United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP). General Assembly Resolution 61/295.
Widlok, T. (2008). Landscape unbounded: Space, place, and orientation in ≠Akhoe Haiǁom and beyond. Language Sciences, *30*(2–3), 362–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2006.12.021