The Hidden Ontology of Language: A Structuralism Resolution to the Measurement Problem in Quantum Mechanics

Main Article Content

Belay Sitotaw Goshu
Muhammad Ridwan
Ramlan

Abstract

The quantum measurement problem continues to challenge classical ontological assumptions embedded in scientific discourse. Substantialist interpretations presume independent entities bearing definite properties, while instrumentalist approaches reduce quantum theory to predictive formalism, both retaining subject-predicate grammar that imposes classical categories onto quantum phenomena. Recent relational interpretations argue that quantum mechanics demands a fundamentally different descriptive mode, one that privileges interdependence and syntactic structure over Substantialist predication. This study explores the linguistic dimensions of quantum entanglement and measurement, drawing on the relational framework to demonstrate how entanglement manifests as a single grammatical structure rather than a causal connection between independent substances. Using QuTiP simulations, we visualized maximally entangled Bell states, reduced density matrices on Bloch spheres, Wigner functions of cat states, Fock distributions, and projective measurement statistics. Nested observer scenarios (Wigner’s friend) were modeled to contrast definite first-person reports with unitary third-person descriptions. Linguistic analysis drew on Saussurean semiotics and contemporary philosophy of physics to interpret visual results. Findings: Reduced density matrices of entangled subsystems are maximally mixed, showing no local definite properties, visualized as vanishing Bloch vectors. Wigner functions and Fock distributions exhibit non-classical interference, while joint measurements reveal perfect correlations as syntactic unfolding rather than causal influence. Wigner’s friend simulations confirm the Friend always experiences definite outcomes, whereas Wigner’s unitary view sustains superposed predication, exposing irreconcilable descriptive frames. Quantum phenomena resist classical subject-predicate grammar; entanglement and superposition embody relational, non-substantial structures whose correlations reflect pre-existing grammatical interdependence within the quantum langue, not mysterious action-at-a-distance. Recommendation: Future interpretations should prioritize relational ontologies that dispense with substantialist premises and develop formal languages capable of expressing quantum interdependence without smuggling classical predication. Empirical tests of relational predictions and interdisciplinary work bridging quantum foundations and semiotics are strongly encouraged.

Article Details

How to Cite
Goshu, B. S., Muhammad Ridwan, & Ramlan. (2026). The Hidden Ontology of Language: A Structuralism Resolution to the Measurement Problem in Quantum Mechanics. LingLit Journal Scientific Journal for Linguistics and Literature, 6(3), 150-163. https://doi.org/10.33258/linglit.v6i3.1437
Section
Articles

References

Bontems, V., & de Ronde, C. (2021). Quantum mechanics: A relational approach. Foundations of Science, 26(3), 525–545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-020-09704-2
Bontems, V., & de Ronde, C. (2021, October 21). You can't always get what you want: A simondonian interpretation of quantum entanglement [Conference presentation]. Laboratoire Kastler Brossel, Paris, France. https://www.academia.edu/107237979/You_cant_always_get_what_you_want_A_Simondonian_interpretation_of_quantum_entanglement
Fuchs, C. A., Mermin, N. D., & Schack, R. (2014). An introduction to QBism and the its loose metaphysics. In G. Chiribella & R. Spekkens (Eds.), Quantum foundations and open quantum systems (pp. 1–23). World Scientific. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814616737_0001
Ghirardi, G. (2002). Collapse theories. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2002 ed.). Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2002/entries/qm-collapse/
Kastner, R. E. (2024). Conventional quantum theory does not support a coherent relational account. Philosophy of Physics, 2(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.31389/pop.158
Nielsen, M. A., & Chuang, I. L. (2010). Quantum computation and quantum information (10th anniversary ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511976667
Saussure, F. de. (1983). Course in general linguistics (R. Harris, Trans.). Duckworth. (Original work published 1916)
Saussure, F. de. (2011). Course in general linguistics (W. Baskin, Trans.; P. Meisel & H. Saussy, Eds.). Columbia University Press. (Original work published 1916)
Schrödinger, E. (1935). Die gegenwärtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik. Naturwissenschaften, 23(48), 807–812. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01491891
Trimmer, J. D. (1980). The present situation in quantum mechanics: A translation of Schrödinger's "cat paradox" paper. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, *124*(5), 323-338. https://www.jstor.org/stable/986572
Wheeler, J. A., & Zurek, W. H. (Eds.). (1983). Quantum theory and measurement. Princeton University Press. (Reprinted selections; foundational discussions on measurement problem).
Wigner, E. P. (1932). On the quantum correction for thermodynamic equilibrium. Physical Review, 40(5), 749–759. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.40.749
Yang, Y. (2022). The integrated structure of language and language behavior, and its psychological path: Psychological life and theoretical physics (II). Science•Economy•Society, *40*(3), 97-124. https://doi.org/10.19946/j.issn.1006-2815.2022.03.009

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >>