Starry Textscapes: Astronomy, Cultural Memory, and AI in Language and Literature A Critical Review
Main Article Content
Abstract
This critical review examines the underexplored convergence of astronomical cultural memory and artificial intelligence in literary studies. Drawing on scholarship in cultural astronomy, memory studies, and AI literary analysis, it argues that both the night sky and algorithmic systems function as memory technologies that organize, transmit, and transform cultural narratives. Traditional constellation lore, from Mesopotamian, East Asian, and Indigenous traditions to medieval European literature has historically encoded cosmic order, social hierarchy, and collective identity into narrative form. Simultaneously, large language models have emerged as generative agents that destabilize authorship and introduce probabilistic mechanisms of textual production. Despite substantial activity in each domain, existing research treats them largely in isolation. To address this gap, the review proposes the concept of Celestial Algorithmic Memory (CAM), a tripartite framework of encoding, transformation, and reception that theorizes how astronomical narratives are digitized, statistically reproduced, and reinterpreted under algorithmic conditions. Methodologically, the study synthesizes peer-reviewed literature (2010–2026) through a systematic search strategy adapted from PRISMA-P principles. Findings highlight persistent divergences between human and AI-generated narratives in emotional depth, moral ambiguity, and cultural specificity, while underscoring the political stakes of training-data selection. The review concludes that as AI increasingly mediates literary production, critical attention to whose celestial narratives are preserved, mutated, or erased becomes an ethical as well as scholarly imperative. CAM thus offers an integrated lens for future interdisciplinary inquiry at the intersection of cultural astronomy, memory studies, and critical AI literary analysis.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.Penulis.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).
References
Becker, A., et al. (2025). I, ChatGPT: Linguistic properties and human experiences of human- versus AI-generated stories. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12, Article 63. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-06341-2
Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2016). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review (2nd ed.). SAGE.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Chauhan, A. S., & Paikane, M. (2026). AI-enhanced visual storytelling: Exploring environmental narratives in literary studies. Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.21659/rupkatha.v18n2.10
Clarke, T. C., & Bolton, S. J. (2010). The planets and our culture: A history and a legacy. Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union, 6(S269), 29–34. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743921310007428
Colella, S. (2025). “The language of the digital air”: AI-generated literature and the performance of authorship. Humanities, 14(8), 164. https://doi.org/10.3390/h14080164
Erll, A. (2011). Travelling memory. Parallax, 17(4), 4–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13534645.2011.605570
European Commission. (2025). Imago Caeli: Visualizing the constellations in Mesopotamian, Greek and Roman art (Project ID 101303087). CORDIS. https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101303087
Guadu, A., & Dibekulu, D. (2026). From Barthes to algorithms: Reimagining authorship and reader agency in the AI era. AI and Ethics, 6, Article 256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-026-01108-0
Hamacher, D. W. (2026). Cultural astronomy in the 21st century: A brave new world. Journal of Astronomy in Culture, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.5070/AC3.64330
Han, Y. J. (2012). Shakespeare and traditional Korean astronomy. The Journal of English Language and Literature, 58(4), 633–653.
Henriksen, E. E. (2024). Algorithmically generated memories: Automated remembrance through appropriated perception. Memory, Mind & Media, 3, e11. https://doi.org/10.1017/mem.2024.8
Huertas, E. M. C. G., & Fernandes, C. M. (2026). Who controls the past? Generative AI and disputes over collective memory in the digital age. Anagramas Rumbos y Sentidos de la Comunicación, 25(49). https://doi.org/10.22395/angr.v25n49a11
Kim, S. (2014). Analysis problem and descriptive accommodation of astronomical story unit of constellation Douniuxing (斗牛星). Journal of Poetics and Linguistics, 27, 53–75.
Kuperjanov, A. (2006). Estonian folk astronomy and national star maps. Folklore, 32, 37–62.
Köseoğlu, G. (2026). Algorithmic postmemory in the age of digital hoarding. Continuum, 40(4), 636–646. https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2026.2629536
Mandolessi, S. (2023). The digital turn in memory studies. Memory Studies, 16(6), 1513–1528. https://doi.org/10.1177/17506980231204201
Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., & Stewart, L. A. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews, 4, Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
Mozaffari, A., Khorramrouz, A., & colleagues. (2026). Applications, performance, and research gaps of large language models in literary studies: A scoping review. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1155/hbe2/8695447
Penprase, B. E. (2017). The power of stars: How celestial observations have shaped civilization (2nd ed.). Springer.
Raza, M. S. (2026, June 27). Artificial intelligence and being: An inquiry into Islamic intellectual tradition. The Week. https://www.theweek.in/news/middle-east/2026/06/27/artificial-intelligence-and-being-an-inquiry-into-islamic-intellectual-tradition.html
Ruggles, C. (Ed.). (2022). Heritage of astronomy. Springer.
Schöch, C., Dudar, J., & Fileva, E. (Eds.). (2023). Survey of methods in computational literary studies (CLS INFRA D3.2). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7892112
Shamseer, L., Moher, D., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., & Stewart, L. A. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: Elaboration and explanation. BMJ, 349, Article g7647. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g7647
Shan, Z., Lee, Y., & Hao, S. (2026). AI writers have a consistent stylometric footprint, but AI editors do not. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.27855
Williams, S. M. (2025). Chaucer pictures the cosmos: Materiality, science, and astral poetics [Doctoral dissertation, University of Oxford]. Oxford University Research Archive. https://doi.org/10.5287/ora-wrkypy5w4