From Lexicon to Cosmology: A Review of Linguistic Dimensions in Cultural Astronomy

Main Article Content

Belay Sitotaw Goshu
Muhammad Ridwan

Abstract

Cultural astronomy, the study of human relationships with the sky has long been dominated by archaeology and the history of astronomy, while its linguistic dimensions remain systematically undertheorized. This narrative review critically examines representative literature from 2005 to 2026 across four thematic domains: star-name semantics, grammatical encoding of celestial knowledge, linguistic relativity in time concepts, and transmission mechanisms of Indigenous astronomical knowledge. The review finds that celestial naming exhibits stable embodied cognitive patterns across languages, yet borrowing and semantic change pathways are more complex than existing models suggest, as demonstrated by Ge'ez planetary nomenclature and Mesopotamian-Greek star-name transmission. Grammatical encoding—noun classification, numeral classifiers, evidential marking, and absolute spatial frames—reveals language as an active structuring mechanism for astronomical cognition rather than a passive mirror, with Tariana evidentiality and Guugu Yimithirr solar-anchored coordinates providing particularly strong evidence. The Amondawa and Aymara cases both challenge and refine the linguistic relativity hypothesis, while their methodological limitations warrant equal scrutiny. Oral genres, Wardaman songlines, Polynesian wayfinding chants, and Rapa Nui material anchors—function as differentiated cognitive storage technologies whose poetic features serve knowledge preservation rather than decoration. The review identifies three systematic limitations in existing scholarship: corpus imbalance favoring written traditions, insufficient interdisciplinary dialogue between linguists and cultural astronomers, and methodological fragility of "absence" judgments. To address these, the paper proposes "celestial semantic domain" as an integrative analytical framework comprising lexical, grammatical, and discourse-genre levels, and argues that cultural astronomy should become a regular domain of semantic typology and language documentation rather than a marginal curiosity. Future priorities include cross-linguistic celestial vocabulary databases, integration of celestial semantics into fieldwork protocols, experimental research on evidentiality and causal reasoning, and cognitive-linguistic models of oral astronomical genres.

Article Details

How to Cite
Goshu, B. S., & Muhammad Ridwan. (2026). From Lexicon to Cosmology: A Review of Linguistic Dimensions in Cultural Astronomy. LingLit Journal Scientific Journal for Linguistics and Literature, 7(2), 150-169. Retrieved from https://www.biarjournal.com/index.php/linglit/article/view/1615
Section
Articles

References

Aikhenvald, A. Y. (2003). Evidentiality in Tariana. In A. Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (Eds.), Studies in evidentiality (pp. 131–164). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.54.09aik
Dinsa, A. B., Wakjira, F. S., Demmesie, E. T., & Negash, T. T. (2022). Indigenous astronomical knowledge based seasonal weather forecast: Evidence from Borana Oromo pastoralists of Southern Ethiopia. F1000Research, 11, 1217. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.121926.1
Eckstein, L. (2025). Tupaia's wind positioning system: (Re)modelling ancestral Polynesian voyaging. The Journal of Pacific History, 61(2), 279. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223344.2025.2562855
Edwards, A., d'Ans, B., & Edwards, E. (2023). Consolidation of the Rapanui astronomy concept inventory and re-appraisal of applied astronomic observation at Papa Ui Hetu'u, Rapa Nui. Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry, 18(4), 139–147. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1478671
Everett, D. L. (2005). Cultural constraints on grammar and cognition in Pirahã: Another look at the design features of human language. Current Anthropology, 46(4), 621–646. https://doi.org/10.1086/431525
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2008). Rethinking metaphor. In R. W. Gibbs Jr. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 53–66). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802.005
Garuda. (2026). Grammatical systems integrate celestial referents [Journal review]. Garuda: Garba Rujukan Digital. https://garuda.kemdiktisaintek.go.id/journal/view/46441
Goshu, B. S., & Ridwan, M. (2025). Integrating Ethiopian Indigenous Astronomical Knowledge with modern astrophysics: A framework for cultural preservation and scientific discovery. Lakhomi Journal: Scientific Journal of Culture, 6(4), 211–238. https://doi.org/10.33258/lakhomi.v6i4.1434
Goshu, B. S. (2026). Celestial categories: How languages encode, structure, and transmit astronomical knowledge across cultures. Lakhomi Journal: Scientific Journal of Culture, 6(4), 42–60. https://doi.org/10.33258/lakhomi.v6i4.1434
Goshu, B.S. and M. Ridwan, (2026), Starry Textscapes: Astronomy, Cultural Memory, and AI in Language and Literature A Critical Review, Linglit Journal: Scientific Journal of Linguistics and Literature, 7(2), 102-115
Goshu, B.S. and M. Ridwan, (2025), The Role of Ge'ez in Shaping Ethiopian Intellectual Traditions: Contributions to Science, Medicine, Astronomy, Religion, Culture, and Mathematical Thought, Lakhomi Journal Scientific Journal of Culture, 6 (3), 186-202
Holbrook, J. C., Medupe, R. T., & Urama, J. O. (Eds.). (2008). African cultural astronomy: Current archaeoastronomy and ethnoastronomy research in Africa. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6639-9
Kinfe Alula, L. (2026, March 25). Shared skies of East and North Africa: Cultural astronomy, planetary nomenclature, and public engagement in Ethiopia [Conference presentation]. 2026 African Astronomical Society Conference, South African Astronomical Observatory. https://events.saao.ac.za/event/13/contributions/605/
Kozma, J. (2009). The semantics of Hungarian and German popular names for stars and star constellations. Névtani Értesítő, 31(1), 143–155.
Kurtik, G., & Militarev, A. (2005). Once more on the origin of Semitic and Greek star names: An astronomic-etymological approach updated. Culture and Cosmos, 9(1), 3–43. https://doi.org/10.46472/CC.01205.02
Levinson, S. C. (1996). Frames of reference and Molyneux's question: Crosslinguistic evidence. In P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. F. Garrett (Eds.), Language and space (pp. 109–169). MIT Press.
Lynch, B. M., & Robbins, L. H. (1978). Namoratunga: The first archaeoastronomical evidence in sub-Saharan Africa. Science, 200(4343), 766–768. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.200.4343.766
Maho, J. F. (1999). A comparative study of Bantu noun classes. Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
Mushin, I. (2012). "Watching for witness": Evidential strategies and epistemic authority in Garrwa conversation. Pragmatics and Society, 3(2), 270–293. https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.3.2.07mus
Norris, R. P., & Harney, B. Y. (2014). Songlines and navigation in Wardaman and other Australian Aboriginal cultures. Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage, 17(2), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1404.2361
Núñez, R. E., & Sweetser, E. (2006). With the future behind them: Convergent evidence from Aymara language and gesture in the crosslinguistic comparison of spatial construals of time. Cognitive Science, 30(3), 401–450. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0000_62
Royal Museum for Central Africa. (n.d.). Bantu Lexical Reconstructions 3. https://www.africamuseum.be/en/research/discover/human_sciences/culture_society/blr/results_main
Sinha, C., Sinha, V. D. S., Zinken, J., & Sampaio, W. (2011). When time is not space: The social and linguistic construction of time intervals and temporal event relations in an Amazonian culture. Language and Cognition, 3(1), 137–169. https://doi.org/10.1515/langcog.2011.006
Soper, R. (1982). Archaeo-astronomical Cushites: Some comments. Azania, 17(1), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/00672708209511275
Whorf, B. L. (1950). An American Indian model of the universe. International Journal of American Linguistics, 16(2), 67–72. https://doi.org/10.1086/464050

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >>